Simonyan’s Famine Threat — The Black Sea Grain Blockade
In June 2022, the Russian state-media figure Margarita Simonyan — RT editor-in-chief, whom I call Maid Marion in the Disinfolklore catalogue — appeared on stage at the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum and recounted, with a warm folksy laugh, a joke she said was circulating in Moscow:
“All hope is pinned on famine.”
“Famine will begin [in Africa] and they [in the West] will come to their senses, will remove sanctions and will be friends with us because it’s impossible to not be friends.”
This line, delivered beside Putin on the dais of Russia’s flagship economic forum, is one of the most archetypally revealing statements the Russian state-media apparatus has ever produced. It announces, openly, the weaponisation of food as an instrument of geopolitical coercion.
The Black Sea Grain Blockade
The archetype was operationalised. From February 2022, Russia’s navy blockaded Ukrainian grain exports from the Black Sea ports. Ukraine is one of the world’s major grain exporters — producing ~10% of global wheat and ~15% of global corn, feeding over 400 million people, especially across Africa and the Middle East. The blockade threatened mass hunger in dozens of countries.
The Archetypal Analysis
Dumézil’s Third Function Weaponised at Global Scale
Russia had tested water as Fertility Weapon in Luhansk. The Black Sea Grain Blockade is food as Fertility Weapon at continental scale. The archetype scales identically from reservoir to grain terminal.
The Famine-as-Leverage Doctrine
Simonyan’s quote states the doctrine explicitly. Russia calculates that African famine, caused by Russian blockade, will produce European policy-change. The archetypal logic: famine someone far away to coerce someone closer.
The Accusation-in-a-Mirror
As the blockade caused grain-export collapse, Russia accused Ukraine of mining its own ports, accused the West of manufacturing the food crisis, accused African governments of insufficient gratitude for Russian fertiliser. The grammatical move is Provocation Mirror scaled to the continent of Africa.
The Partial-Solution Theatre
The July 2022 Black Sea Grain Initiative (brokered by Turkey and the UN) allowed some grain exports. Russia alternately accepted, obstructed, withdrew-from, and re-entered this arrangement. Each oscillation produced headline-event archetypes — crisis, resolution, crisis, resolution — that maintained the grain-blockade’s grip on international attention.
The Sovereign-Generous-Exit Template
Each time Russia resumed Black Sea exports, Kremlin media archetyped Russia as generous benefactor: we chose to let the grain flow, to feed the world. The Merciful Sovereign archetype was deployed to convert blockade-easing into sovereignty-performance.
The Witch-Switch
Note too the Mana of Coercive Control immanent in Maid Marion’s disarming child-like plea: “because it’s impossible not to be friends.” This Mana contrasts with the almost childlike belief in this Disinfolklore strategy to compel the child in the playground to be your friend, matching precisely the menace of Pavel Gubarev’s “we will keep killing you until you accept our rule.”
This witch-switch between victim (no-one wants to play with me) and murderer (we’ll starve as many Africans as we need to) is immanent in Russian and MAGA Disinfolklore. One moment they’re playing a grievance-mining David, the next they’re playing Goliath.
The Counter
The counter, as with the Gas Weapon, requires physical-infrastructural diversification — grain corridors through Romania and Danube ports; land-route exports through Poland and Baltic states; emergency UN food-aid programming.
You cannot refute a blockade with an argument. You refute it by moving the grain differently.
Simonyan quote documented: Saint Petersburg Economic Forum, June 2022. Initiative: Black Sea Grain Initiative signed 22 July 2022; Russia withdrew 17 July 2023.
See also: ← Back to Archetypes